Beibu Gulf Bank exposed the case of illegal lending nest: 7 employees were prisoned by the chief of prisoners of the “scandal” threat

1 thought on “Beibu Gulf Bank exposed the case of illegal lending nest: 7 employees were prisoned by the chief of prisoners of the “scandal” threat”

  1. Recently, the second instance of the Qinzhou Intermediate People’s Court of Qinzhou City, Guangxi, rejected the appeal of Wei Shubin and others of the former president of the Qinzhou Branch of Beibu Gulf Bank, and maintained the original sentence.
    If in the “nest case” of Qinzhou Branch, a total of 7 employees were involved in the case and were sentenced to sentence. Liang Wenjie, the general manager of the two departments, and the president assistant Mo Mouzheng, Huang Mou, general manager of the credit management department, and Tan Mou, the customer manager.
    C collective crimes
    In the second half of 2013, Liang used the name of Guirui company that he operated to apply for loans from Qinzhou Branch to return loans to usury borrowings on the grounds of purchasing original wood materials.
    During the application of loans, the defendants Tan, Liang Wenjie, Ning, Huang, Mo Mou, and Wang did not seriously review Guirui’s loan materials in accordance with regulations. The usal loan borrowing used to return others does not meet the loan regulations and agrees to approval, resulting in a loan from the Qinzhou Branch of 12 million yuan from the Qinzhou Branch.
    In the incident, Guirui still owed a loan principal of 11.7 million yuan in loans of Qinzhou Branch, with interest of 8.3281 million yuan.
    The court found that the Seven defendants violated national laws and regulations on banks, and did not fulfill their responsibilities in accordance with regulations. As a result, Qinzhou Branch violated the law and provisions to issue a loan of 12 million yuan to Guirui. Essence
    “Gossip” threats
    The “scandal threat” threats were also exposed after the loan was issued, and a false lawsuit occurred.
    In December 2013, after Liang’s borrowing of 12 million yuan from Qinzhou Branch, it returned Liu Mou from 1.635 million yuan. Ye Mou believes that the defendants Wei Shubin and Liang Wenjie helped Liang transferred the above money, causing their losses, and threatened the fact that the facts of the Qinzhou Branch issued loans and their relationship with Wei Shubin had undergone the relationship between men and women. Liang Wenjie recovered 1.63 million yuan to him.
    In Wei Shubin’s confirmation: One day after he went to work at the Beibu Gulf Bank Business Department in February 2014, Ye sent a photo sitting on her thigh and calling to help her recover 163 163 10,000 yuan, otherwise it will smell it and make his wife ion.
    A Wei Shubin and Liang Wenjie were forced to raise 1.63 million yuan (Wei Shubin 1 million yuan and 630,000 yuan in Liang Wenjie) to Ye Mou. Although he calmed down Ye’s threat, the 1.63 million yuan Wei Shubin and Liang Wenjie were reluctant to pay for it. After planning, the two sides deceived Liang’s daughter to issue 1.63 million yuan of false rendering, and held the above -mentioned recovery to the court to prosecute. In January 2017, the People’s Court of Qinnan District made a judgment to support the prosecution.
    The court believes that the defendants Wei Shubin and Liang Wenjie filed civil lawsuits to the people’s court with false facts and disrupted the judicial order. His behavior has constituted false lawsuits.
    The conspiracy
    In the second half of 2011, Qinzhou Branch decided to set up a branch in Qinzhou Port. In August of that year, the defendants of the then president of Qinzhou Branch Wei Shubin, Liang Wenjie, Wang Shi, and Song (Wang Mounian’s good friends) went to Qinzhou Port to choose the location. A shop was leased to the office and business of the Qinzhou Port Sub -branch, and promised to use the position to promote the site selection and leasing.
    It to earn the rent difference in the future. In the year of Wang, Wang, Liang Wenjie, Ning, and others have purchased shops in the above location in the name of close relatives. Subsequently, Wei Shubin, Ningmou, and others used their respective positions. By controlling the Qinzhou Branch, they were leased to the Qinzhou Branch for the Qinzhou Port Sub -branch’s business and office space through the price of the Qinzhou Branch.
    In 2014, the masses will report Wei Shubin, Ning, Liang Wenjie, and Wang for a significant high lease price to report their own purchases to the Qinzhou Branch to the Qinzhou Branch. Turn to Qinzhou Branch. Wei Shubin was the president of the Qinzhou Branch. The survey results showed that no behavior of the lessor’s bribery and greeting was found, nor did it find that the leadership team asked for bribery, as well as the leasing and the leadership team to deliberately raise the rent price to divide the profit from it.
    The price department was determined by the price department after the incident. The unit price per square meter on the first floor was 50 yuan/month. The actual lease price of the Qinzhou Branch was 120 yuan per square meter. From 2012 to 2016, the rents that the Qinzhou Branch actually paid a total of 6.534 million yuan was actually paid to the above shops.
    The court determined that the defendants Wei Shubin, Wang Shidian, Liang Wenjie, and Ning used illegal possession to use their duties to control (increase) rent prices to jointly embezzle public property. The amount was particularly huge. Conflict and punishment.
    The maximum judgment of 20 years
    The with Wei Shubin and Ning’s arrest, more and more criminal facts have also emerged.
    It also found that Wei Shubin was the president of Qinzhou Branch and the deputy governor of Qinzhou Branch, and the two received a bribe of 230,000 yuan and 150,000 yuan, both of which constituted a bribery.
    The first trial of the People’s Court of Pu Bei County, Guangxi, the defendant Wei Shubin committed illegal loan, false lawsuits, corruption, bribery, and punished four crimes, and sentenced to 20 years in prison. In the year of Wang, Ning, and Liang Wenjie ranged from 12-18 years, respectively. Tan, Huang, and Mo Mou was sentenced to violations of the crime of issuing loans and was sentenced to probation.
    The second instance of the Qinzhou Intermediate People’s Court maintained the original judgment.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top
Scroll to Top